2016 IL App (4th) 120721 - People v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Franks v. Delaware · 99 Ill. 2d 389 - Foutch v. O'BRYANT · 226 Ill. 2d 92 - People v. Wheeler · 185 Ill. 2d 532 - People v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he county shall be entitled to a $10 fee for each conviction or order of supervision for a criminal violation * * *. * * * All such fees collected shall be deposited by the county in a fund to be established and known as the County Jail Medical Costs Fund.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Mullen“shall be paid by the defendant in any traffic, misdemeanor, municipal ordinance, or conservation case upon a judgment of guilty or grant of supervision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Burlington“), a $10 assessment for the State's Attorney Office Fund (the $10 assessment for the State's Attorney is included in the $40 charge listed for the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Burlington
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.