People v. Gharrett’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 226 Ill. 2d 92 - People v. Wheeler · 212 Ill. 2d 274 - People v. Cunningham · 209 Ill. 2d 19 - People v. Thompson · 41 Ill. 2d 434 - The PEOPLE v. Weaver · 404 Ill. App. 3d 839 - People v. Pelo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hether [her] testimony was rationally based on her perception does not depend on whether [she] had personal knowledge of the actual objects or actions depicted by the video.... [A]ll that is relevant is whether [the clerk's] opinion-that the video depicted a particular object-was the kind of opinion that a layperson could normally draw.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holley“Id. ¶ 51 For 50 years, Illinois courts consistently followed Weaver , holding that when a person enters a building with the intent to commit a theft or felony, that person enters”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Holt“authority to enter a business building, or other building open to the public, extends only to those who enter with a purpose consistent with the reason the building is open.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Holt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.