State v. Russell’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Martinosky · State v. Shegrud · State v. Laurence Stewart II
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“from them. Russell , ¶ 9 . The record nonetheless showed that Russell was aware that she was fleeing from the police because after an initial traffic stop, she swore at the officer, then sped away, refusing to stop again for multiple officers who had their emergency lights and sirens activated. Russell , ¶ 22 . During the pursuit, Russell used her brakes and turn signal, ** illustrating her general awareness while driving. Russell , ¶ 23 . We held that these facts taken together demonstrated Russell's knowledge that she was eluding police. Russell , ¶ 23 . We observed that Russell's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jensen“knowingly engages in conduct that creates a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jensen“fully aware of his actions and the probable outcome of those actions, thus acting knowingly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jensen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.