State v. Putney’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Kleppe · B.W.S. Investments v. Mid-Am Restaurants, Inc. · Keller v. Bolding · State v. Hatlewick · State v. Bingaman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A district court abuses its discretion if it acts in an arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable manner, if its decision is not the product of a rational mental process leading to a reasoned determination, or if it misinterprets or misapplies the law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rogers · State v. Sanchez“State has the burden of proving the amount of restitution by a preponderance of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rogers“wide degree of discretion when determining restitution awards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rogers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.