Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 ND 154 - State v. Francis

State v. Francis’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reynolds v. Sims · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · United States v. Armstrong · Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement · Harman v. Forssenius

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The doctrine of overbreadth prohibits the law from criminalizing constitutionally protected activity. A governmental purpose to control or prevent activities constitutionally subject to state regulations may not be achieved by means which sweep unnecessarily broad and thereby invade the area of protected freedoms.' City of Fargo v. Salsman , 2009 ND 15 , ¶ 25, 760 N.W.2d 123 (citations omitted). 'The overbreadth doctrine permits an individual whose own speech or conduct may be prohibited ... to challenge a statute on its face because it also threatens others not before the court-those who desire to engage in legally protected expression but who may refrain from doing so.' McCrothers Corp. v. City of Mandan , 2007 ND 28 , ¶ 27, 728 N.W.2d 124 (alteration in original) (quoting SOB, Inc. v. Cnty. of Benton , 317 F.3d 856 , 864 (8th Cir. 2003) ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.