Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 ND 46 - Rath v. Rath

Rath v. Rath’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Prchal v. Prchal · Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Ziebarth · Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-Riemers · DUFNER v. Trottier · Hartleib v. Simes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A claim for relief is frivolous under N.D.C.C. § 28-26-01(2) only if there is such a complete absence of actual facts or law a reasonable person could not have expected a court would render a judgment in that person's favor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In exercising that discretion, the court may impose reasonable restrictions upon the length of the trial or hearing and upon the number of witnesses allowed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]llegations and denials in any pleadings in court, made without reasonable cause and not in good faith, and found to be untrue. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.