Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 OHIO 1027 - In Re D.S.

In Re D.S.’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
1
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

87 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gault · Kent v. United States · Hudson v. United States · Breed v. Jones · State v. Ruff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the judge determines that it is appropriate to impose juvenile-offender-registrant status, the judge must conduct a tier-classification hearing to determine whether the child should be classified as a Tier I, II, or III sex offender. R.C. 2152.83(C) and 2152.831.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “impose classification under R.C. 2152.83(B) only after it conducts a hearing to consider certain statutory factors and determine whether the child should be labeled a juvenile offender registrant. R.C. 2152.83(B)(2).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “shall be construed for purposes of this division to be references to”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.