¶1
(¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to the holdings regarding double jeopardy and' due process on the authority of
In re D.S.,
146 Ohio St.3d 182, 2016-Ohio-1027, 54 N.E.3d 1184.
¶2
{¶ 2} The remainder of the appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.
O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in
In re D.S.
and would order briefing on the issues raised in the remainder of the appeal.
*111
Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Charlyn Bohland, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, A.W.
