Disciplinary Counsel v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Weaver · Melling v. Stralka · Disciplinary Counsel v. Potter · Disciplinary Counsel v. Niermeyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the Ohio Constitution does not require legislative review of rules governing the discipline of attorneys, we follow a rulemaking procedure to promulgate new and amend existing Rules for the Government of the Bar. This process includes public notice, time for public comment and input from stakeholders such as interested committees or task forces, and a process for the justices to consider public comments received and proposed changes before final approval.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[a] lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of lawyers.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[l]awyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.