Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 OHIO 7369 - In Re D.S.

In Re D.S.’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Burton v. United States · State v. Fugate · State v. Talty · State v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In In re Thomas, we construed R.C. 2152.18(B)'s predecessor statute, R.C. 2151.355(F)(6), Am.Sub.S.B. No. 181, 148 Ohio Laws, Part V, 10488, 10529, which contained the same "in connection with" phrase. See 100 Ohio St.3d 89 , 2003-Ohio-5162 , 796 N.E.2d 908 , ¶ 11. We held that a juvenile is entitled to credit for the time served in a rehabilitation or treatment facility while awaiting the adjudication or disposition of the original delinquency complaint as well as the time the juvenile is held in one of those facilities on a complaint for a probation violation related to the original delinquency complaint. Id. at ¶ 10, 13. We explained, "Such detention goes to the original disposition in the case and is sufficiently linked to the adjudication of the original charges that credit is required by the statutory language." Id. at ¶ 13. See also In [S.D.], 5th Dist. Stark Nos. 2001CA00093 and 2001CA00121, 2001 WL 1548758 , (Dec. 3, 2001).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “It is not the habit of the Court to decide questions of a constitutional nature unless absolutely necessary to a decision of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.