Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 OHIO 8076 - State v. Cepec (Slip Opinion)

State v. Cepec (Slip Opinion)’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

95 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Johnson v. Zerbst · State v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of [the] right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[T]he threshold inquiry is whether, with reference to a range of acceptable, though not necessarily model, judicial behavior, the [trial] court's conduct falls demonstrably outside this range so as to constitute hostility or bias.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In absence of any showing of bias, prejudice, or prodding of a witness to elicit partisan testimony, it will be presumed that the trial court acted with impartiality [in propounding to the witness questions from the bench] in attempting to ascertain a material fact or to develop the truth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.