Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 Pa. Super. 105 - Commonwealth v. Aikens

2016 Pa. Super. 105 - Commonwealth v. Aikens’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. DiFrancesco · Commonwealth v. Booth · Commonwealth v. Dickson · Commonwealth v. Magliocco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Offense defined. — A person commits an offense if he is intentionally in contact with a minor, or a law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties who has assumed the identity of a minor, for the purpose of engaging in an activity prohibited under any of the following ... : (1) Any of the offenses enumerated in Chapter 31 (relating to sexual offenses). [[Image here]] (b) Grading. — A violation of subsection (a) is: (1)- an offense of the same grade and degree as the most serious underlying offense in subsection (a) [herein Chapter 31 offenses] for which the defem dant contacted the! minor; or (2) a felony of the third degree; whichever is greater.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Defendant] has been charged with unlawful contact with a minor. To find [Defendant] guilty of this offense, you must find that each of the following elements has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt: First, that [Defendant] was intentionally in contact for the purpose of engaging in an unlawful act — and in this case, that unlawful act is alleged to be [IDSI], the crime that we just discussed, that I just defined for you[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.