2016 Pa. Super. 13 - Commonwealth v. Curley’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Upjohn Company v. United States · in the Matter of Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Asset Management Corporation · Commonwealth v. Chmiel · Estate of Kofsky · In Re Investigating Grand Jury
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But at this point,'Your Honor, we are willing to put Miss Baldwin in the grand jury without addressing any of the issues related to the testimony of Mr. Schultz and Mr. Curley and conversations she had with them about that testimony and put that — put those matters on hold until we get a Court determination regarding the privilege and we can address that later on.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.