2016 Pa. Super. 196 - Commonwealth v. Faurelus’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Commonwealth v. Johnson · Commonwealth v. Moore · Commonwealth v. Carson · Commonwealth v. Faulkner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the proscriptions of the Fourth Amendment and Article I, § 8, do not apply to searches and seizures conducted by private individuals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Yim
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.