Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 Pa. Super. 212 - Commonwealth v. Zeigler

2016 Pa. Super. 212 - Commonwealth v. Zeigler’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Turner · 379 Pa. Super. 390 - Commonwealth v. Finley · Commonwealth v. Lark · Commonwealth v. Gamboa-Taylor · Commonwealth v. Perez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a subsequent PCRA petition cannot be filed until the resolution of review of the pending PCRA petition by the highest state court in which review is sought, or upon the expiration of the time for seeking such review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “prevailing law requires that the subsequent petition must give way to a pending appeal from the order denying a prior petition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.