2016 Pa. Super. 63 - Commonwealth v. Farabaugh’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission · 128 S. Ct. 166 - Perez v. Oakland County, Michigan · Commonwealth v. Kennedy · Com., Dept. of Transp. v. Taylor · Conway, M., et ux v. The Cutler Group, Inc., Aplt.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To summarize: (a) where a plea bargain is structured so the defendant will not have to register or report as a sex offender or he will have to register and report for a specific time; and (b) the defendant is not seeking to withdraw his plea but to enforce it, then the "collateral consequence" concept attributed generally to sex offender registration requirements does not trump enforcement of the plea bargain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In determining whether a particular plea agreement has been breached, we look to what the parties to this plea agreement reasonably understood to be the terms of the agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although a plea agreement occurs in a criminal context, it remains contractual in nature and is to be analyzed under contract-law standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.