Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 SD 1 - State v. Fischer

State v. Fischer’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Whren v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When conducting our review, we 'determine whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.' " Id. (quoting State v. Quist , 2018 S.D. 30 , ¶ 13, 910 N.W.2d 900 , 904 ). "To do so, we ask whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “We invoke our discretion under the plain error rule cautiously and only in ' exceptional circumstances. '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Ordinarily an issue not raised before the [circuit] court will not be reviewed at the appellate level.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.