Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 SD 21 - Petition for Declaratory Ruling

Petition for Declaratory Ruling’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 554 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Linda R. S. v. Richard D. · Asarco Incorporated v. Kadish · Voss v. Ralston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cannot add language that simply is not there.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.