State v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Arvizu · 134 S. Ct. 1683 - Prado Navarette v. California · State v. Reynolds · 206 Wis. 2d 51 - State v. Waldner · State v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“totality of the circumstances of each case to see whether the detaining officer [had] a particularized and objective basis for suspecting legal wrongdoing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bowers“draw on [his] own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bowers“The stop may not be the product of mere whim, caprice or idle curiosity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bowers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.