Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 SD 29 - Ageton v. Jackley

Ageton v. Jackley’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gormley v. Lan · State v. Johnson · Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning Commission · Save Centennial Valley Ass'n, Inc. v. Schultz · Schulte v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cannot be concerned with what the Attorney General should have said or could have said or might have said or what is implied or suggested by what he did say. Rather we must focus on the language chosen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “some act forbidden by law or neglected to do some act required by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “include every practical or possible effect of each initiated measure,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.