Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 SD 34 - State v. McCahren

State v. McCahren’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Solem v. Helm · Nix v. Williams · Harmelin v. Michigan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, what were the circumstances surrounding the interrogation; and second, given those circumstances, would a reasonable person have felt he or she was not at liberty to terminate the interrogation and leave. Once the scene is set and the players’ lines and actions are reconstructed, the court must apply an objective test to resolve the ultimate inquiry: was there a formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with a formal arrest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “what were the circumstances surrounding the interrogation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.