Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 SD 57 - State v. Bariteau

State v. Bariteau’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Petition of Famous Brands, Inc. · State v. Brim · State v. Nelson · State v. Smith · State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To establish plain error, an appellant must show '(1) error, (2) that is plain, (3) affecting substantial rights; and only then may this Court exercise its discretion to notice the error if, (4) it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]f the words and phrases in the statute have plain meaning and effect, we should simply declare their meaning and not resort to statutory construction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The intent of a statute is determined from what the Legislature said, rather than what we think it should have said.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.