Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UT 39 - Nevares v. Adoptive Couple

Nevares v. Adoptive Couple’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A

Relies on State v. Menzies · ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C. · Stephens v. Fourth Judicial District Court · Wheeler v. McPherson · Barnard v. Wassermann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]void jurisdictional competition and conflict with courts of other States in matters of child custody.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “determines that neither the child, the child and one parent, nor the child and a person acting as a parent have a significant connection with this state and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). 7 ¶15 Under the UCCJEA, a Utah court has jurisdiction to make an initial custody determination 8 only if any one of several different jurisdictional prerequisites are met. Applicable here, a Utah court has jurisdiction if Utah is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.