Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UT 47 - State v. Mackin

State v. Mackin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal · United States v. Owens · State v. Holgate · State v. Menzies

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal, we review the record facts in a light most favorable to the jury's verdict and recite the facts accordingly. We present conflicting evidence only as necessary to understand issues raised on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We will reverse the jury's verdict only when the evidence, so viewed, is sufficiently inconclusive or inherently improbable that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime of which he or she was convicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “we review the evidence and all inferences which may reasonably be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.