Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UTAPP 104 - State v. Whitaker

State v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Francis v. Franklin · State v. Holgate · Layton City v. Carr · State v. Workman · State v. Herrera

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, before we can uphold a conviction it must be supported by a quantum of evidence concerning each element of the crime as charged from which the factfinder may base its conclusion of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We recognize [that] proof of a defendant's intent is rarely susceptible of direct proof and therefore the prosecution usually must rely on a combination of direct and circumstantial evidence to establish this element.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A guilty verdict is not legally valid if it is based solely on inferences that give rise to only ... speculative possibilities of guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.