Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UTAPP 105 - State v. Pham

State v. Pham’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · State v. Nielsen · People v. Fry · State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because being shot can lead to death, it is not inherently unreasonable for a jury to find that a particular shooting resulted in serious bodily injury by creating a substantial risk of death.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.