2016 UT App 120 - State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Crawford v. Washington · Brecht v. Abrahamson · State v. Hamilton · State v. Bond
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An error is harmful if, absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome for the appellant, or phrased differently, if our confidence in the verdict is undermined.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Guzman“sufficiently inconsequential [such] that there is no reasonable likelihood that it affected the outcome of the proceedings,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. York“an evidentiary error cannot result in reversible error unless the error is harmful”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. York
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.