Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UTAPP 125 - Fish v. Fish

Fish v. Fish’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Nielsen · IHC Health Services, Inc. v. D & K MANAGEMENT, INC. · Kimball v. Kimball · Hall v. Hall · 2010 UT App 139 - Connell v. Connell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reasonable to assume that the [district] court actually considered the controverted evidence and necessarily made a finding to resolve the controversy, but simply failed to record the factual determination it made.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “are adequate when they contain sufficient detail to permit appellate review to ensure that the district court's discretionary determination was rationally based.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We are not aware of any Utah authority requiring a district court to find that [a substantial material change in circumstances] has occurred simply because one party's income has increased and the divorce decree did not discuss possible increases in income. Were it otherwise, creeping inflation could necessitate recalculation of nearly all alimony awards on an annual or biennial basis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.