Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UTAPP 13 - State v. Dozah

State v. Dozah’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kentucky v. Stincer · State v. Maestas · State v. Low · 2011 UT App 168 - State v. Burke · State v. Archuleta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal from a jury verdict, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to that verdict and recite the facts accordingly.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “district court's refusal to give a requested jury instruction for correctness”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether a given jury instruction correctly states the law is reviewable under a correction of error standard, with no particular deference given to the district court's ruling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.