Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UT App 157 - State v. Bell

2016 UT App 157 - State v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dunn · State v. Bernal · State v. Clark · State v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is a reasonable probability that ... the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.