Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UT App 167 - State v. Rackham

2016 UT App 167 - State v. Rackham’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Shickles · State v. Lucero · State v. Harmon · State v. Verde · State v. Cuttler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the likelihood of a different outcome in the absence of the rule 404(b) evidence ... is sufficiently high to undermine confidence in the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reflected the jury's assessment of his character, rather than the evidence of the crime he was charged with.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.