Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UT App 177 - State v. MacNeill

2016 UT App 177 - State v. MacNeill’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brigham City v. Stuart · State v. Menzies · State v. Bishop · State v. Lafferty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In effect, [Father] now attempts to supplement the briefing submitted in his earlier appeal. The mandate rule bars such attempts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “defendant has the burden of demonstrating the existence of actual prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.