2016 UT App 182 - Andersen v. Andersen’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Patterson v. Patterson · Daines v. Vincent · Kimball v. Kimball · Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh · Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we afford the trial court considerable latitude in adjusting financial and property interests, and its actions are entitled to a presumption of validity”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dole v. Dole
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.