2016 UT App 22 - State v. Abelon’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ott · State v. Jaeger · State v. Pursifell · State v. Waterfield · State v. Veteto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny alleged inaccuracies in the [PSR], which have not been resolved by the parties and the department prior to sentencing, shall be brought to the attention of the sentencing judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson“determine on the record the relevance of that information as it relates to sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson“make findings on the record regarding the accuracy of the information at issue;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.