Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UT App 245 - State v. Phillip

2016 UT App 245 - State v. Phillip’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bearden v. Georgia · United States v. Warner · State v. Candedo · State v. Peterson · In Re Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[b]eing unsuccessfully discharged' from therapy is different than ... 'having failed to participate in sex offender therapy,' " and contends that the district court overstepped its bounds by determining that Defendant was unsuccessfully discharged. ¶19 We disagree. In so doing, we note that Defendant appears to misapprehend which branches of government are involved during the imposition, modification, or revocation of probation. "[T]he judicial branch has the authority to begin probation and to terminate probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the authority to terminate probation before its natural expiration has been allocated by statute to the judicial branch”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a division of the Department of Corrections”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.