Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UT App 47 - Meyer v. Aposhian

2016 UT App 47 - Meyer v. Aposhian’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. Bayles · Legacy Resources, Inc. v. Liberty Pioneer Energy Source, Inc. · Donjuan v. McDermott · Wohnoutka v. Kelley · 2012 UT App 283 - Hale v. Big H Construction, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must be specifically raised in a timely manner and must be supported by evidence and relevant legal authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Under this standard, a court must consider the entire context surrounding [respondent's] conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “provides for an individualized objective standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.