Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 UT App 70 - State v. Jaramillo

2016 UT App 70 - State v. Jaramillo’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Solem v. Helm · Harrington v. Richter · McNeill v. United States · Harrington v. Richter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a trial court's sentencing decision will not be overturned unless it exceeds statutory or constitutional limits, the judge failed to consider all the legally relevant factors, or the actions of the judge were so inherently unfair as to constitute abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[c]ounsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to object to the admission of Facebook messages, which contained inadmissible and prejudicial character evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel raised for the first time on appeal for correctness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.