Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2016 VT 113 - State v. Michael Grace

State v. Michael Grace’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Allen · Kentucky v. Stincer · United States v. Clark · State v. Yoh · United States v. Law

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there [wa]s nothing to indicate that counsel consulted with defendant on this point and explained his rights and what he would be sacrificing by not appearing, or that defendant in response knowingly and voluntarily waived the right,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “evidence is adduced that relates to disputed factual issues critical to the outcome of the case, and the defendant's absence would undermine its fairness and accuracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “One of the most basic of the rights guaranteed by the Confrontation Clause is the accused's right to be present in the courtroom at every stage of his trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.