Charles Chandler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mitchell v. National Broadcasting Co. · John Hubicki v. Acf Industries, Incorporated, John Hubicki v. United Steelworkers of America and Acf Industries, Inc. · Ball v. Melsur Corp. · State v. Russo · In re Chandler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court is not required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is clear that § 7134 bars litigation of claims actually raised and decided on the merits in an earlier PCR.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t matters little, if any, what standard of review is used”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.