Heather A. Harada v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Affronti v. United States · Vaughn v. State · Federal Trade Commission v. Crafts · Sorenson v. State · Hicklin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]fter a district court considers the wide latitude of variables in a defendant’s case and circumstances, it can impose any probation condition so long as it is reasonably related to a penal goal such as rehabilitation; deterrence, or public protection. See Jones [v. State], 2002 WY 35, ¶ 36 , 41 P.3d [1247] at 1257-58 [ (2002) ]. The court must “take into-consideration on a case-by-case basis the nature and circumstances of the offense and the probationer’s history and characteristics.” State v. McAuliffe, 2005 WY 165, ¶ 17 , 125 P.3d 276, 280 (Wyo. 2005).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.