ELA v. AAB’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on DH v. Wyoming Department of Family Services · Kobos by and Through Kobos v. Everts · Gjertsen v. Haar · In the matter of ARF, a minor child: JKS v. AHF · Stuart Goforth v. Jamey Fifield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If this temporary custody arrangement is disagreeable to the parties, or parental alienation continues to occur, the Court will be forced to enter a final order determining the long-term custody of the children. Both parties have presented valid arguments for why they should be or continue to be the primary custodian of the children. This temporary order is the Court's last effort to help the parties co-parent their children, and is believed to be in the best interests of the children. If this temporary solution fails to meet the needs of the parties, the Court will be forced to enter a final ruling on custody. This would likely result in one of the parties having substantially decreased visitation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Womack v. Swan“The touchstones of due process are notice and the opportunity to be heard. With regard to the amount of process due, we have explained that the notice and the opportunity to be heard must be appropriate to the nature of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Womack v. Swan“[i]f Father had any question as to what would be heard at the hearing, a motion for clarification or call to the district court could have cleared up any confusion ... and he had more than enough time to prepare”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Womack v. Swan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.