McArthur v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Howard v. State · Roberts v. State · Westerman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“McArthur's remaining claims include the following: that he was discriminated against because a second attorney had not been appointed to represent him in a capital case; that he was convicted of capital murder without being found guilty of the underlying felony; that he has been denied due process because there is no remedy in the State of Arkansas for an inmate who discovers new evidence after conviction that is not scientific in nature; and that he had been precluded from assisting his attorney in a meaningful way due to his being denied access to a McArthur v. State , 2017 Ark. 120 , 515 S.W.3d 585 . law library while in custody. These claims for relief are not cognizable in coram nobis proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McArthur v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.