Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 ARK 297 - State v. Cossio

State v. Cossio’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gaines v. State · Turner v. State · Dandridge v. State · McGalliard v. State · Farmer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not admissible by the defendant ... to prove consent or any other defense, or for any other purpose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “circumstances so nearly related to the main fact under consideration as to illustrate its character and the state of mind, sentiment and disposition of the actor are parts of the res gestae, which embraces not only the actual facts of the transaction and the circumstances surrounding it, but also matters immediately antecedent to and having a direct causal connection with it, as well as acts immediately following it and so closely connected with it as to form in reality part of the occurrence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.