Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 ARKAPP 209 - Simon v. State

Simon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Dilday v. State · Penn v. State · 2015 Ark. App. 529 - Whitt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.... [A] single act may be an offense against two statutes, and if each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not, an acquittal or conviction under either statute does not exempt the defendant from prosecution and punishment under the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.