People v. Hyde’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

22 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “drives or operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state . . . is deemed to have given consent to one or 19 No. 2015AP304-CR more tests of his or her breath, blood or urine, for the purpose of determining the presence or quantity in his or her blood or breath, of [alcohol or other prohibited substances], when requested to do so by a law enforcement officer.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 383 Wis. 2d 192 - State v. Gerald P. Mitchell · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Glen Gary MONTOYA

2. “Hyde's statutory consent satisfied the consent exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 383 Wis. 2d 192 - State v. Gerald P. Mitchell · State v. Navdeep S. Brar

3. “An unconscious driver, on the other hand, 'shall be tested to determine the alcohol or drug content of the person's blood.' [Colo. Rev. Stat.] § 42-4-1301.1(8) [2016]. In other words, under the Expressed Consent Statute, the police need not wait until a drunk-driving suspect returns to consciousness, in order to afford that suspect an opportunity to refuse.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Navdeep S. Brar