Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 CO 26 - Fitzgerald v. People

Fitzgerald v. People’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Griffin v. California · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · South Dakota v. Neville · 133 S. Ct. 1552 - Missouri v. McNeely

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen there has been no search, the Supreme Court has all but said that anything short of criminalizing refusal does not impermissibly burden or penalize a defendant's Fourth Amendment right to be free from an unreasonable warrantless search. We take that short leap today and conclude that introducing evidence of [the defendant's] refusal to consent to a blood or breath test to determine his BAC did not impermissibly burden his Fourth Amendment right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether motorists lawfully arrested for drunk driving may be convicted of a crime or otherwise penalized for refusing to take a warrantless test measuring the alcohol in their bloodstream.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “of implied-consent laws that impose civil penalties and evidentiary consequences on motorists who refuse to comply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.