Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 CO 59 - Carter v. People

Carter v. People’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Malloy v. Hogan · Dickerson v. United States · Missouri v. Seibert · Duckworth v. Eagan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t would be highly counterintuitive for a reasonable suspect in a custodial setting, who has just been informed that the police cannot talk to him until after they advise him of his rights to remain silent and to have an attorney, to understand that an interrogation may then proceed without permitting him to exercise either of those rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he district court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the jury unrestricted access to both a video recording and transcript of the defendant's custodial interrogation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “without qualification that he had the right to an attorney”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.