Bermel v. BlueRadios, Inc’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc. · BRW, Inc. v. Dufficy & Sons, Inc. · 110 So. 3d 399 - Tiara Condominium Ass'n v. Marsh & McLennan Companies · In Re the Marriage of Allen · Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“remov[ing] any Company Materials [including Proprietary Information] from the business premises of [BlueRadios] ..., except as [Bermel was] required to do in connection with performing [his] duties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“cannot preclude a claim under the civil theft statute because the legislature explicitly provided that cause of action, and its attendant remedy, to victims of theft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“simply whether the legislature intended to establish a cause of action for victims of theft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.