State v. D. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
July 2022
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Alleyne v. United States · Stanley v. Lemire · State v. Weldele
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]roof of the prior DUI was required as an element of the offense of aggravated DUI”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A person commits the offense of aggravated driving under the influence if the person is in violation of 61-8-401, 61-8-406, or 61-8-411 and: (a) the person's alcohol concentration, as shown by analysis of the person's blood or breath, is 0.16 or more; (b) the person is under the order of a court or the department to equip any motor vehicle the person operates with an approved ignition interlock device; (c) the person's driver's license or privilege to drive is suspended, canceled, or revoked as a result of a prior violation of 61-8-401, 61-8-402, 61-8-406, or 61-8-411; (d) the person refuses to provide a breath sample as required in 61-8-402 and the person's driver's license or privilege to drive was suspended, canceled, or revoked under 61-8-402 within 10 years of the commission of the present offense; or (e) the person has one prior conviction or pending charge for a violation of 45-5-106, 45-5-205, 61-8-401, 61-8-406, 61-8-411, or this section within 10 years of the commission of the present offense or has two or more prior convictions or pending charges, or any combination thereof, for violations of 45-5-106, 45-5-205, 61-8-401, 61-8-406, or 61-8-411.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Holland“Meyer's offer to stipulate to the prior convictions at sentencing failed to address the issue that the Aggravated DUI statute requires the jury to find that there were prior DUI convictions in order to convict Meyer of the charged offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.