State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “approach .... Instead, he offered alternative theories as to why the jury should acquit him of aggravated burglary -that he did not knowingly enter Loney's apartment and that he fought with Loney in self-defense. The evidence could have supported the jury in finding that Daniels knocked on Loney's apartment door, that Loney exited the apartment, and that the two fell through the apartment door while they were fighting-i.e., that Daniels did not”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Freiburg

2. “[t]he evidence could have supported Daniels's argument that he did not knowingly enter or remain in Loney's apartment even if Loney was not the aggressor in their fight. Daniels therefore was entitled to the lesser-included assault instruction.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Freiburg

3. “This court reviews for correctness the legal determinations a lower court makes when giving jury instructions, including whether the instructions, as a whole, fully and fairly instruct the jury on the applicable law.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Freiburg